An annual media plan is a document that translates one or two business goals into a budget split between channels, with a clear role for each channel, a success metric and a review date. A good plan opens with the question of what the business needs to achieve, and derives the mix from there. Last year's file serves mainly as background. This also makes it easy to defend before management: every shekel is tied to a logic that can be explained in one sentence.
In brief
- יעד לפני ערוצים. The mix is derived from the business goal, not from last year's split with a few percent of adjustment.
- מותג וביצועים יחד. The effectiveness studies the IPA publishes indicate that a balance between brand building and sales activation is usually better than focusing on one of them.
- מדד ומדד הגנה. Each channel has one success metric and a second metric that prevents blind optimization, and all of them are set before launch.
- תוכנית בעמוד אחד. A plan that can be presented in one table is easier to present, discuss and approve.
What is an annual media plan, and how is it different from a marketing plan?
An annual media plan is the part of the marketing plan that defines where, when and at what scale the brand will appear in paid media over the year. A marketing plan is broader: it also deals with product, pricing, distribution, messages and service. Media is one tool among several, even if it's the most prominent tool in the reports.
The distinction matters, because the media plan is often asked to solve problems that aren't media problems. If the product isn't competitive on price, or the site doesn't convert, increasing the budget won't fix it. So a good media plan starts with a short check: is the business problem really solved by reaching and persuading the audience, or somewhere else in the chain.
It's also worth separating two concepts that tend to get mixed up. A marketing budget is the total amount the company allocates to marketing activity, including media, production, tools and services. A media mix is how the media portion is divided between channels, formats and periods. When they are separated from the start, you don't discover mid-year that production has eaten the media budget.
How do you build an annual media plan step by step?
Build it from the top down: business goal, audiences, a role for each channel, metrics, budget and a review schedule, in that order.
- מגדירים יעד עסקי אחד או שניים. Growth in market share, a product launch, strengthening against a new competitor or improving the profitability of an existing channel. A long list of goals makes it hard to set priorities.
- מתרגמים את היעד לשאלה שיווקית. Whom do you need to persuade, of what, and by when, for the business goal to be achieved.
- מגדירים קהלים. Who already knows and buys, who knows but doesn't buy yet, and who hasn't heard of the brand at all. Each group has a different task.
- נותנים לכל ערוץ תפקיד במשפך. Awareness, consideration, conversion or retention. A channel without a clear role is a channel that will be hard to justify in the second quarter.
- קובעים מדד הצלחה ומדד הגנה לכל ערוץ. And decide in advance which data source each metric will be measured from and how a conversion will be counted.
- מחלקים את התקציב לפי תפקידים, לא לפי הרגל. Including a fixed line for experiments in new channels, formats and messages.
- מתכננים את העיתוי. Seasonality, holidays, launches and periods when competitors push hard.
- קובעים מועדי בקרה וכללי החלטה. At least once a quarter, with a clear definition of what is expanded, what is stopped and who decides.
The step that's easy to skip is the second. Without translating the goal into a marketing question, the discussion may jump straight to channels and focus on what's already familiar. A well-phrased question, such as "how do we get the competitor's customers to consider us before their annual renewal", already points to an audience, a message and a timing.
How do you split the media budget between brand building and performance?
Split it in advance, according to the goal and the state of the brand, and not anew every month according to the latest report.
Performance campaigns are easy to measure, so they tend to get a large share of the budget. Brand building is activity aimed at increasing the number of people who know the brand, remember it and prefer it, even before they're looking to buy. Sales activation is activity aimed at driving immediate action among those already ready to buy. The two depend on each other: a performance campaign works better when there is demand for the brand, and brand building pays off more when there is a mechanism that converts the demand created into sales.
The most common evidence on the topic comes from studies by Les Binet and Peter Field for the IPA, the UK's Institute of Practitioners in Advertising. According to the research presentation the IPA publishes, it is based on an analysis of 996 campaigns for 700 brands in 83 categories from its effectiveness database. According to a summary published on the IPA blog, the optimal split found in The Long and the Short of It was 60:40 between brand building and activation, and the follow-up study Effectiveness in Context from 2018 arrived at 62:38.
The research also distinguishes between two types of effect. According to the presentation, rational, immediate messages generate a large direct effect that decays quickly, while emotional activity generates a smaller effect on sales that decays slowly. The IPA itself warns that short-term metrics alone can be misleading. The data here is based on what the IPA publishes on its website, as of the article's last update.
It's important to read the number correctly. It's an average found in a broad database, not a formula that fits every brand. The state of the brand and the category can justify a different split. What's worth taking from the research is the principle: when the whole budget goes to short-term metrics, the reports may look good even as growth weakens. Repeatedly postponing brand building may create חוב מותג.
What is a media mix, and how do you choose the channels?
A media mix is a combination of channels in which each channel gets a different role in the funnel, so they complement each other rather than compete for the same customer.
A marketing funnel is a description of the stages a customer goes through on the way to purchase: awareness, consideration, decision and retention. Some channels are good at reaching broadly an audience that isn't searching yet, and some are good at capturing existing demand, such as paid search that reaches people the moment they type a question. Owned channels, such as email and an app, mainly serve the retention stage. A healthy mix ensures that each stage has someone responsible for it.
When choosing channels, it's worth going through four questions:
- איפה הקהל נמצא בפועל. Based on exposure and usage data for the specific audience, not just on general trends.
- מה הערוץ יודע לעשות היטב. Broad reach, search intent, precise targeting or long-form content that allows explaining a complex product.
- האם יש לנו נכס יצירתי מתאים. A video channel without a suitable video asset will struggle to justify the investment in it.
- איך נדע שהוא עובד. And if it can't be measured directly, what will count as reasonable evidence of success.
What does a one-page media plan look like?
A one-page media plan is a table in which each row answers one question, and each channel appears with its role, metric, guardrail metric and budget.
The following template is a starting point. The middle column shows what to write in each section, and the far column shows a question that helps check whether what was written is sharp enough. Fill in the numbers according to the brand's own data.
| Section | What to write here | Check question |
|---|---|---|
| יעד עסקי | One or two goals in business terms, such as sales, market share or new customers, with a target date | Will the finance management recognize this goal as its own? |
| קהלים | A small number of defined audiences, and for each, what it needs to think or do | Can you explain in one sentence why this particular audience? |
| Channel | The channel name and the main format we'll use | Do we have a creative asset that fits this channel? |
| Role in the funnel | Awareness, consideration, conversion or retention, and one main role for each channel | If we remove the channel, which funnel stage will suffer? |
| KPI | One success metric per channel, and its data source | Is the metric tied to the business goal or only to activity? |
| Guardrail metric | A second metric that checks that improvement in the main metric doesn't come at the expense of quality | What could go wrong if we improve only the KPI? |
| Budget share | A percentage of the total media budget, including a separate line for experiments | Does the split reflect the roles or last year? |
| Review date | The date of the next review and the title of the role that makes the decision | What will count as a reason to expand, and what will count as a reason to stop? |
It's worth keeping the table as a living document rather than a file sent once a year. At every review meeting, update it and mark what changed and why, and it becomes the basis for next year's plan.
How do you set success metrics before spending a shekel?
For each channel, set one success metric, one guardrail metric and an agreed data source, and document all of this before launch.
A KPI is a key performance indicator: the number that determines whether the channel did the job it's in the plan for. A guardrail metric is a secondary metric meant to make sure the improvement in the KPI doesn't come at the expense of something else important. Without a guardrail metric, automated optimization knows how to find the easy way to improve one number.
Some common pairs:
- עלות לליד. Together with the share of leads that became customers, so the lower cost doesn't come from weak leads.
- החזר על הוצאות פרסום. Together with the share of new customers or gross profit, so the system doesn't focus only on people who would have bought anyway. We expanded on this in the article on ROAS and profit.
- היקף חשיפה. Together with frequency, so reach isn't built mainly from repeat impressions to the same people.
You also need to agree in advance on a single source of truth for conversions, the attribution model and the time window. We detailed the pitfalls in the guide איך לקרוא דוח קמפיין. Even when exposure to the campaign and branded searches rise in the same period, that still doesn't prove the campaign caused the increase. So, where possible, it's worth planning an incrementality test in advance too, meaning an experiment that compares a group exposed to the advertising with a similar group that wasn't, to know what the advertising actually added.
What does management want to see in an annual media plan, and how do you defend it?
Management wants to see logic, risks and oversight: why this split, what happens if something doesn't work, and when we'll know.
- היגיון. A direct line between the business goal and every line in the budget, without lines that exist only because they were there last year.
- סיכונים. What happens if a main channel doesn't deliver results, and what the alternative plan is.
- בקרה. When reviews happen, by which metrics, and who is authorized to move budget between channels.
Two additions turn a reasonable plan into one that's easy to approve. The first is scenarios: a base scenario, a cut scenario and an expansion scenario, each with an advance definition of what gets cut first and what gets added first. When a request to cut comes mid-year, the decision already exists and doesn't need to be improvised under pressure.
The second addition is a fixed experiments budget, because platforms, competitors and audience behavior change during the year. A small part of the budget, set aside in advance for testing new channels, formats and messages, makes it possible to learn without risking the core. At every quarterly review you decide which experiment moves into the fixed budget and which is stopped.
How we approach this at CONNECT
At CONNECT, part of the Bruckner Yaar Levi advertising group, an annual media plan starts with a conversation about the business, not about channels. Together with the brand we phrase the goal and the marketing question, map the competitive picture using competitor research, and only then build the one-page table with a role, metric, guardrail metric and budget for each channel.
Before committing budget to a particular message, it can be tested inearly message testing, and then measured against the real audience after launch.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a marketing plan and a media plan?
A marketing plan defines everything the brand does to achieve its business goals: product, price, distribution, messages, service and communication. A media plan is part of it, and deals with where, when and at what scale the brand will appear in paid media. It's best to build the marketing plan first, because without a clear goal and message, the media plan becomes a list of channels with amounts.
How much of the media budget should go to brand building and how much to performance?
There is no single number that fits every brand. The Binet and Field studies the IPA publishes found, in a broad database of campaigns, that the optimal split was about 60:40 in favor of brand building, but that's an average and not a rule. A new brand, a category with a long purchase cycle or online-only sales can justify a different split. The main thing is to decide in advance, and not move everything to performance just because it's easier to measure.
When should you start building an annual media plan?
It's best to start a few months before the year begins, to have time to summarize the previous year, phrase goals with management and test messages before committing budget. If the plan is built in the last two weeks of the year, it may end up very similar to the previous file, with small adjustments. Brands with strong seasonality should plan around their main season, not the calendar.
What is a guardrail metric in a media plan?
A guardrail metric is a secondary metric that accompanies the main success metric and checks that improvement in it doesn't come at the expense of quality. For example, if the main metric is cost per lead, the guardrail metric can be the share of leads that became customers. Without such a metric, automated advertising systems can lower lead costs by bringing a less relevant audience, and the report will look excellent while sales don't move.
How often should the media plan be updated?
The annual plan is worth reviewing at least once a quarter, in a meeting with decision rules set in advance: what is expanded, what is stopped and who decides. Ongoing optimization within the channels of course happens much more often. The difference is that in the quarterly review you move budget between roles and channels, while in ongoing optimization you improve performance within each channel, without changing the plan's logic.
ראו גם: Media Planning & Buying · Performance Campaigns · Data & Measurement · איך לקרוא דוח קמפיין · חוב מותג
Sources: IPA – The next chapter for The Long and The Short of It · IPA – The Long and the Short of It, research presentation
רוצים לבנות יחד את תוכנית המדיה לשנה הבאה? השאירו פרטים.